plasticsuper Site Admin

註冊時間: 2005-08-04 文章: 555 來自: 台北
|
發表於: 星期一 七月 26, 2010 1:32 pm
文章主題: [新知]從那裡抽出來的脂肪存活率比較高? |
|
|
要抽脂補脂的客人通常會問我要從那兒抽?我說隨便,看你喜歡從肚子或大腿都可以。有些人聽到這答案後會正色的對我說:醫師,可是我上次去xx診所詢問,那個醫師說從大腿抽出來的脂肪比較好;不然就是說:網路上很多人說肚子的脂肪太軟很容易吸收掉。
Wo-oh, 網路上鄉民的見解就算了,我比較在意的是那個醫師說從大腿抽出來的脂肪比較好?
讓我們來看看專家實驗結果吧!
篇名: In Search of Improved Fat Transfer Viability
作者: Rod J Rohrich , Evan S Sorokin, Spencer A Brown (<--都是大咖, 尤其是Rohrich)
雜誌: PRS 2004;113:391
簡述:
Fat grafting is an unpredictable procedure that continues
to challenge the field of plastic surgery due to irregular
resorption. Applications for this procedure are broad in both
reconstructive and cosmetic plastic surgery. Fat grafts are
carefully obtained and manipulated to obtain better graft
takes and results, yet there is no universal agreement on what
constitutes an ideal methodology. The present study examines
adipocyte viability from four commonly used donor sites
in five subjects.No statistical differences in adipocyte viability
were demonstrated among abdominal fat, thigh fat, flank fat,
or knee fat donor sites that were immediately removed and
untreated (p 0.225). In addition, no differences were
observed in representative tissue samples that were removed
and centrifuged (thigh, p 0.508; knee, p 0.302; flank, p
0.088; abdomen, p 0.533). On the basis of these quantitative
data, neither harvest location nor centrifugation
demonstrated any advantage in terms of lipocyte viability. Fat
tissue transfers from these common sites may be considered
equal, and centrifugation does not appear to enhance immediate
fat tissue viability before implantation.
結果如這二表所示
簡單地說明結論:從四個不同部位(肚子、腰、大腿、膝蓋)取出的脂肪,不論有沒有離心,它們的存活率沒有差別
下一次再有人跟你說什麼大腿的脂肪因為有在運動所以比較結實比較好時(山雞比肉雞有咬勁的反射式推理?)你就可以告訴他這種說法是沒有根據的。 _________________ With malice toward none, with charity for all
各位!電腦不要看太久,起來運動一下吧
 |
|
|